Create By Prompt
Workflow

Client delivery and revisions with AI creative work

How to scope, deliver, and revise AI-assisted creative work—direction locks, revision rounds, file handoff, disclosure, and protecting margins.

Client delivery and revisions with AI creative work

AI makes it easy to show too many options and hard to protect time and quality. This page is the client-facing operating system: scope, reviews, revisions, and handoff—so projects end in invoices, not infinite regen.

Pairs with commercial-use checklist and design & brand direction locks.

Principles

  1. Exploration is a paid phase, not a free unlimited buffet.
  2. Clients approve directions, not seed roulette galleries without criteria.
  3. Revisions map to the brief, not vague “make it pop.”
  4. Delivery includes files + notes, not mystery PNGs.
  5. AI disclosure follows the contract, not vibes.

Scope template (paste into proposals)

PhaseIncludesExcludes
DiscoveryBrief workshop, refsUnlimited stakeholder workshops
ExplorationN directions, timeboxedInfinite spins mid-call
ProductionLocked direction, M finalsNew concepts after lock
RevisionsR rounds of brief-aligned changesScope resets
HandoffAgreed formats + archive noteOngoing free edits

Define N, M, R in numbers. Ambiguity is unpaid work.


Review ritual that works

Before the meeting

During

After

Used well in brand kit and storyboard cases.


Revision types (price them differently)

TypeExampleHandling
CorrectionMissed a stated must-haveCovered in round
PreferenceWarmer light within directionCovered if in round budget
Direction changeNew industry, new metaphorNew exploration phase
Scope addExtra aspect ratios, extra productsChange order

If everything is called a “tweak,” your margins die.


File handoff checklist


Communication snippets

Direction lock

“Please choose Direction A or B for production. After lock, changes that restart concepting are a new exploration phase.”

Vague feedback pushback

“Can you map that note to the brief—light, product accuracy, or crop? I’ll revise against a specific constraint.”

AI policy

“We’ll use AI-assisted generation within the tools listed in the SOW, with human art direction and finish. Let us know if your brand requires full disclosure on published assets.”


Protecting quality under pressure

When clients rush:

  1. Protect the brief and contact sheet.
  2. Cut option count, not finish.
  3. Prefer static over broken motion.
  4. Refuse rights-reckless requests (rights).

Speed without gates creates expensive rework.


Agency / freelancer differences

ContextExtra care
FreelancerWritten AI clause; deposit before exploration
AgencyProducer owns timebox; AD owns taste
In-houseBrand system tokens beat one-off gens

Delivery package example (stills campaign)

/client_project/
  00_brief.md
  01_style_kit/
  02_approved_contact_sheet.pdf
  03_finals/
    web/
    social/
    print_masters/   (if in scope)
  04_layers/         (if contracted)
  05_notes/
    tools_used.txt
    disclosure.txt
    postmortem.md

Clients who receive only a Slack dump of PNGs will ask for “the real files” forever. Structure is part of professionalism.


Red flags in client requests

RequestResponse posture
“Clone this living artist’s look for our ads”Decline or reframe to original refs (rights)
“Just make 50 options tonight”Requote exploration; protect finish
“Use free tier, commercial launch Monday”License risk—escalate
“Morph our real product freely”Accuracy rules for commerce
“Don’t tell legal we used AI”Walk away

Your reputation is longer than one invoice.


Revision round math

If a round includes three SKUs × four crops × two language markets, say so in the SOW. AI does not make matrix work free—it makes it easier to underestimate. Tie rounds to decision objects (frames, boards), not hours of spinning.


Kickoff agenda (30 minutes)

  1. Success test in one sentence
  2. Must-include / must-exclude
  3. AI policy and disclosure
  4. Exploration timebox and option count
  5. Revision rounds and what triggers a change order
  6. Delivery formats
  7. Next meeting date for direction lock

Send the notes the same day. Projects without kickoff notes become telepathy contests.

Published by Tabaconda LLC, Florida, USA.

Revision protocol that keeps projects profitable

Most AI creative jobs die on “endless tweaks,” not on generation speed. Put a protocol in the SOW.

Default package

ItemDefault
Included rounds2 (concept) + 1 (final polish)
What counts as a roundConsolidated feedback in one message within 5 business days
Out of scopeNew art direction, new product SKU, new aspect ratios beyond agreed set
Change orderHourly or fixed add-on quoted before work

Feedback template (send to clients)

Round N feedback for [asset]:

1) Keep: …

2) Change: … (max 5 bullets)

3) Must-not: …

4) Reference (optional URL or prior frame): …

If feedback arrives as 20 conflicting chat messages, you may pause and ask for a consolidated list. That is professionalism, not obstruction.

Delivery folder structure

/project-slug/
  00-brief/
  01-approved-refs/
  02-rounds/r1 r2 r3/
  03-finals/print web social/
  04-prompts-and-seeds/  (if licensed to share)
  05-license-notes/

Cross-link: Batch production · Commercial checklist.

Published by Tabaconda LLC, Florida, USA.

Useful physical tools for creator tools work. Optional product searches (see disclosure). Buy only what you need.

🎨 Back to Studio